impact
  • Home
    • About impact >
      • impact in a nutshell >
        • impact's origin story >
          • bio: Kathy Kaplan OAM
        • What else does impact do? >
          • Advocacy & awareness raising
          • Interest-free loans
          • Grants to Refuges
          • Bursaries
          • impactFUL launch party
          • Childcare at Moorabbin Court
      • Our Board >
        • Our vision, mission & values
        • Our policies >
          • Constitution
          • COVID-SAFE measures
          • Acknowledgement of Country
          • Privacy Policy
          • Inclusion Policy
          • Volunteer Policy
          • Child Safety Policy
        • AGM 2022
        • Last year's achievements
        • Board Only Section
    • What is Family Violence?
    • Myth Busting
    • Upcoming events
  • Ways to Help
    • How YOU can help
    • Messages of Hope
    • Donate your dollars
    • Donate your time, effort & skills
    • Bags of Love >
      • Bags of Love - how to help
      • Bags of Love - what to give
    • Trees of Love
    • Court Childcare Project
    • Give them a meal
    • Purses with Purpose
    • Become a sponsor >
      • Sponsor financially
      • Sponsor in kind
  • Get help
    • if your friend needs help
    • Who you can turn to
    • Create a safety plan
    • Tips to help a friend >
      • Helpful things to say, ask or do
      • Things NOT to say, ask or do
    • Tips for youth
    • Tips for male victims
    • Tips for LGBTIQ victims
    • Tips for older people
    • Tips if you witness violence
    • Stay safe online >
      • Conduct an online safety audit
      • Create a strong password
      • Mobile phone safety
      • Computer & internet safety
      • Online banking safety
      • Clear your devices' history
      • Disable tracking devices
  • Get involved
    • Become a Member
    • Volunteer >
      • Coffee Lunch & Craft Group
  • Facts & Stats
    • What is Family Violence?
    • Australia's great shame: the facts >
      • Australia's death toll: 2022
      • Australia's death toll: 2021
      • Australia's death toll: 2020
      • Australia's death toll: 2019
      • Australia's death toll: 2018
    • Cycle of Abuse
    • Warning signs
    • Gaslighting
    • Royal Commission into Family Violence
    • National Community Attitudes Survey
  • Articles, Blogs & Personal Stories
    • News Articles & Blogs
    • Personal Stories
  • Contact us
  • xmas 2020 video
  • Annual Report 2022
  • W&P video 2022
  • PJV chanukah 2006

Family violence inquiry written off as a 'waste of time' after judges excused from appearing

23/8/2017

0 Comments

 
A flagship parliamentary inquiry into the family law system will not hear testimony from either the chief justices of the Family Court or the Federal Circuit Court, in a move child protection advocates say renders the inquiry pointless.
Attorney-General George Brandis​ has written to the House of Representatives committee on social policy and legal affairs, saying it would be inappropriate for the judges to give testimony on a "contested policy area".
"For reasons going to the heart of the separation of powers, I am of the view that the appearance of the judges before parliamentary inquiries about contested policy areas is rarely, if ever, appropriate," 
 Senator Brandis wrote.

"For one thing, the subjection of judges to questioning by parliamentarians gives the impression that the judiciary is somehow subordinate to the legislature (even if a judge appears voluntarily). More importantly, members' questioning inevitably runs the risk of drawing witnesses into matters of political controversy from which the judiciary should remain separate."
The committee is looking at how the family law system could better protect and support people affected by family violence.
Hetty Johnston, executive chair of child protection advocacy group Bravehearts, said if the chief justices could not give testimony then the parliamentary inquiry would be "a waste of time".
"It's shown itself to be totally ineffectual. It's clear to everyone. Our argument is the inquiry was a waste of time because it can't ask the hard questions and this has been proven to be the case. Why is the taxpayer paying for this?" Ms Johnston said.
Ms Johnston and other family violence campaigners, including Rosie Batty are calling for a royal commission into the family law system.
Child protection campaigner Hetty Johnston says there is no point holding the family violence inquiry if the chief justice cannot give testimony. Photo: Peter Rae"The family law system is archaic, backwards and horrendously dangerous. A royal commission is the only legal instrument that's capable of overcoming all the obstacles," Ms Johnston said.
The committee asked Senator Brandis for his advice after the scheduled appearances of the chief justice of the Family Court, Diana Bryant, and the chief justice of the Federal Circuit Court, John Pascoe, were cancelled at short notice.
At the time, government ministers Greg Hunt, Alan Tudge and Michael Sukkar were facing contempt of court allegations after making comments criticising the Victorian judiciary for what they described as weak sentences given to terrorists.
The chief justices have made written submissions to the inquiry but members of the committee will not be able to question them about their submissions.
The committee's chair and Liberal MP Sarah Henderson said it was "prudent and appropriate" to seek Senator Brandis's advice.
"The Attorney-General appears to have drawn a distinction between judges appearing before parliamentary inquiries in their personal capacity and heads of jurisdiction appearing in relation to the operations or decisions of courts over which they preside," Ms Henderson said.
But the committee's deputy chair, Labor MP Sharon Claydon, said the advice was a "drastic and detrimental departure from a time-honoured practice of the Parliament".
"It's been standard practice for parliamentary committees to take testimony from judges about important legal matters. This testimony has long been crucial in helping committees to come to informed decisions and make effective recommendations. How can committees make recommendations about important legal reforms without speaking to the heads of jurisdictions that see the human face and consequences of these laws every day?" Ms Claydon said.
A spokeswoman for chief justice Bryant and chief justice Pascoe declined to comment.
A spokesman for Senator Brandis declined to comment.



This article was written by Stephanie Peatling and was copied from here.


0 Comments

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.

    Archives

    September 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016

EVERY DOLLAR MAKES A DIFFERENCE
Picture


impact acknowledges the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander People as the First Peoples of Australia, the traditional owners of the lands and waters throughout Australia: lands and waters which have never been ceded.
​We recognise their continuing connection to land, waters and community and we pay our respects to their peoples, their cultures, their languages and to their elders past, present and emerging.

​
View impact's Privacy Policy here

Picture
Picture
Picture
Picture


​impact is very proud to call the following organisations our key partners:
Picture
Picture
Picture
Picture
ABN: 17 159 728 753
PO BOX 217 GLEN HUNTLY 3163

Copyright © 2022