impact
  • Home
  • Donate
  • Events
    • Upcoming events
    • Mum's Day 2018 >
      • Bags of Love ideas
    • Highlights from previous events
  • About impact
    • impact's brochure
    • What is impact? >
      • impact in a nutshell >
        • impact's recent achievements
      • How does impact get funded? >
        • How your donations are used
    • impact's privacy policy
  • How to give or get help
    • I need help now >
      • Find a Safe Place
      • Create a Safety Plan
    • Support Agencies
    • Help a Friend >
      • Helpful things to Say, Ask or Do
      • Things NOT to Say, Ask or Do
      • Agencies which might be of assistance
      • Help your friend create a safety plan
    • Tips if you witness violence
    • Stay Safe Online >
      • Mobile Phone Safety
      • Banking Safety
      • Computer Safety
      • Internet Safety
      • Clear your cache
      • Create a secure password
    • Advice for Kids
  • Facts & Stats
    • Death Toll of Violence in Australia 2018
    • Definition of Family or Domestic Violence
    • Australian Stats
    • Cycle of Violence
    • Warning Signs
    • Royal Commission into Family Violence
  • Myths
    • Why doesn't she just leave?
    • Not just women; Not just 'straight' families >
      • Male Victims
      • LGBTIQ Victims
    • It's not just about hitting
  • News & Opinions
  • Contact
    • Board Members
    • Founder/President of impact

Parliamentary inquiry into family law will be critical, insists committee head Sarah Henderson

23/8/2017

0 Comments

 
A committee investigating the failings of the family law system will still be critical of the sector despite not calling senior judges to give evidence, according to the head of the inquiry.
Key points:
  • Parliamentary inquiry into failings in family law system will not call judges to give evidence
  • Inquiry chair Sarah Henderson says despite this, the report will be critical of the system
  • Deputy chair Sharon Claydon argues inquiry will be hampered without the judges' evidence
Liberal MP Sarah Henderson had been criticised by Opposition members of the committee for cancelling a scheduled appearance by the Chief Justice of the Family Court and the Chief Judge of the Federal Circuit Court hours before they were due to give evidence.
Ms Henderson argued she wanted to seek the expert advice of Attorney-General George Brandis on whether the judges giving evidence in person would breach the principle of separation of powers, which protects the independence of the judiciary from the influence of parliament.
Deputy Chair of the Committee, Labor MP Sharon Claydon, said the efficacy of the inquiry would be hampered without the judges' evidence, and argued the judges were "highly competent" and able to decide what was appropriate to tell the committee.

But Ms Henderson told the ABC's AM: "I was concerned, and I think it was very prudent and appropriate...that subjecting judges to questioning and interrogation by members of parliament crossed the very important principle of separation of powers.
"We referred this to the Attorney-General, the Attorney-General agreed that this is a fundamental tenet of our democracy.
"I didn't think it was appropriate to put judges in a place where they could be subverted to the harassment or the interrogation of members of parliament."
The judges will still make submissions to the committee in writing.
Ms Claydon led the criticism of Ms Henderson, arguing that the judges had given evidence before parliamentary committees before.
"What we can't do is undermine the judiciary, and that's probably something maybe the deputy chair doesn't quite understand," Ms Henderson said.
"While judges have appeared before parliamentary committees before, what the Attorney has done is drawn a distinction between judges appearing privately and in relation to the operation and decisions of the courts over which they preside.
"I have no doubt that our inquiry will be quite critical in parts about some of the decisions and processes in the Family Court."
Major reform needed in family law systemThe inquiry is hearing evidence in Alice Springs, where Ms Henderson said some of the failings of the family law system were most keenly felt.
They include serious delays in the court processes and the significant expense of hiring lawyers.

"Too often, family violence is not being ascertained early enough in proceedings and that's having major impact on orders made by the court, particularly in relation to children and the safety of children," Ms Henderson said.
"The Northern Territory Government says Aboriginal women are 40 times more likely to be hospitalised as a result of violent assault, most committed by partners or ex-partners as a result of alcohol.
"The rates of non-disclosure are also very high."
Ms Henderson argued some of the people brought in to compile reports on the parlous state of some families were gouging the system.
"Some of them are charging up to $9,000 a day, it's absolutely outrageous," she said.
"Courts rely on family report writers to determine many of the factual matters between warring parents, and particularly involving children.
"I cannot believe the Family Court hasn't addressed this matter — they're not accredited, they're not trained."
0 Comments

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.

    Picture

    Archives

    March 2018
    February 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016

Picture
Picture
Picture
Picture

​impact acknowledges the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander People as the First People of Australia.
We r
ecognise their continuing connection to land, waters and community.
We pay our respects to the Aboriginal and Islander peoples, their cultures and to their elders both past and present.
Picture
Picture
The ACNC Tick of Charity Registration (the Registered Charity Tick) aims to gives reassurance to the public that the charity is transparent and accountable by highlighting its presence on the ACNC Charity Register. impact is proud to be one of the charities to have received the ACNC's Registered Charity Tick.
impact for women inc
PO Box 277 ​Glen Huntly VIC 3163

© copyright 2018
abn: 17 159 728 753
✕